ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science?

by Dr Charles Parker on July 4, 2010 · 20 comments

136165399 3ce143c8a8 m ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science?

Image by redjar via Flickr

ADHD Medications Need Some Basic Rules
ADHD Medication Rules: Paying Attention To The Meds For Paying Attention is hot off the press – and is available July 4 -> July 11 at the promised early bird discount. If you add your name to the Rules mailing list I will keep you posted on some forthcoming training programs as well.

Yes, I’m excited to make these details available – they’re long overdue, – thanks for your patience!

Yes, no more reminders! It’s out there for review and discussion. I’ve been writing about these issues since starting blogging back on this first CorePsych post, back in Nov, 2006. See if this sounds familiar from that first post almost 4 years ago:

Psych problems are not like sinusitis, and psych meds for ADHD or Bipolar, for any complex or simple emotional problems, often need more insight than a reflexive dusting of neurotransmitters.

Happy 4th!
Just in case you haven’t noticed: July 4 is today.., and you only have 7 days left to take advantage of this special offer. ADHD Med Rules is available only this week for $15.00, so jump on it now.

Rules, quite simply, will be a game changer – I know because the detailed facts in *Rules* have improved my ADHD treatment(s) game significantly. Rules contains 160 pages of all the specific strategies I have found essential for ADHD treatment during my career of 41 yrs -  and I’m sending it out so you and yours don’t have to learn the hard way, through mistakes and “misfortune.”

Why should you care?
Because so many are not paying attention to specific rules regarding using stimulant meds to treat paying attention. Paradoxical, but true.

Too many aren’t thinking about thinking. We aren’t using available basic science to dial in the meds correctly. We don’t have good targets with the current outdated diagnostic coding – and so many ignore basic metabolic, mind/body interactions.

So often we’re treating appearances, not people.

rsz 1rulescover2 ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science?

Use Rules To Start

Folks, we have trouble, right here in River City.
Anywhere in the US – and I’ve been bi-coastal for years now – ADHD treatment misunderstandings and complaints remain pervasive. It doesn’t matter if you live in Possum Hollow, NYC or LA, it’s highly likely you will  not find this useful information in your neck of the woods – I know because I’ve been there, several times.

And by the way, – after July 11 Rules will increase in price to $37- the price of a med check in many parts of the country – a reasonable price point that will likely save you hundreds, perhaps thousands of dollars over the many years of misunderstanding, misdiagnosis, drug interactions, and ineffective medication dosing strategies. If Rules doesn’t change your view, doesn’t change the way you are thinking about ADHD, ask for a refund – no problem.

I’ve treated too many people who have been in treatment for more than 20 years that were shocked to see how these new, very basic ADHD Medication Rules and understandings completely changed their own treatment perspectives – indeed changed their lives. Many times they appeared aghast as I simply started the the first interview by questions about the duration of effectiveness of the stimulant meds they have been using for years!

Take a look at this PR Web Press Release for more details, [including the Precise Solutions White Paper] – and please forward this note to anyone interested the important new Neuroscience insights available to treat ADHD – using both mind and body evidence. And if you have seen some benefit from ideas in these CorePsych Blog pages do feel free to drop a comment here for those who still questioning change.

The more you know, the better you can work with your own medical team. Remember:

Neuroscience evidence changes thinking.

If you want to download Rules at this discounted price, do hit this CoreBrain Store link, it’s working! A quick FYI on the order page – you need to log on to order, – and that log on gives me a record of your purchase so we can remain connected.

If interested in becoming an affiliate see the link below.
I look forward to our improved conversations for ADHD treatment,
Talk soon,
cp

Related articles by Zemanta
ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science?

Digitally available now at Nook, Kindle, Barnes and Noble.
ADHD Medication Rules – PDF For Your Desktop  
ADHD Medication Rules | Paying Attention To The Meds For Paying Attention – Kindle Version


Tagged as: ADD, ADD and ADHD, ADD Medications, ADHD Medications, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, brain function, Dr Charles Parker, Intuniv, Mental health, Neuroscience, Neurotransmitters, Psychiatric Medications, SPECT & Brain Imaging, Therapeutic Window, Vyvanse

  • Victoria Mozafari

    My son is 7 yr.old was diagnosed with ODD with some ADD symptoms. Had a brain (SPECT) scan which indicates low Gaba. He is defiant, does not like to follow directions, short fused, persistent, extremely intelligent and too focused on one thing and at times, has a difficult time with peers. Does not do well on stimulants. The clinic recommended Abilify, alone did not help the defiance. His pediatrician recommended Intuniv 2mg. Intuniv alone does not work on all symptoms, he has been on Intuniv 2mg/1mg every other day along with Abilify 1mg everyday for the past 6 mo. his symptoms are gradually returning. His Pediatrician wants to eventually take him off of Abilify. What are your thoughts on taking him off of Abilify increasing Intuniv and adding Gaba supplement?
    Thank you.

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      Victoria,
      Great questions that typify the current abundant misunderstandings about SPECT interventions – I’m sure the folks at the clinic, likely an Amen Clinic, did not tell you that the SPECT showed low GABA, but likely did report that the temporal lobes were slightly cold and that such an appearance often responds to GABA [GABAergic] products.

      My response to that suggestion is a very big maybe. The appearances of SPECT do imply certain possible neurotransmitter responses, and the possibility of more precision in diagnosis/practice is there with SPECT, – but that next leap of specific-what-to-do is too much, way to general, from a more evolved appreciation of neurophysiologic details. Interestingly, the evidence from SPECT is helpful, but the implication of what to do with those findings still needs far more precise attention.

      Before I made any next moves on a boy with refractory responses to what would appear should be predictable ADHD meds I would suggest a more informed inquiry with neurotransmitter testing. With that testing information certain other challenging elements that don’t show up in SPECT could be specifically addressed before simply trying more meds without better targets. One specific example is a problem I just described in a recent post on glutamate excess creating angry moods. Such a condition could result in significant deterioration with more Intuniv dosed on top of the glutamate abundance. Have done this myself.
      cp

  • Chanel

    Hi again Dr.Parker,
    Just wondering if you’ll be offering another special offer on your new ADHD book? In true A.D.D. fashion, I missed the special by hours…got busy, & remembered too late.
    Thanks for considering,
    Chanel

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      Chanel,
      No special offer in the wings, sorry.
      cp

  • ChanelB

    Hi Dr. Parker,
    I’m looking forward to reading your new book! I have two questions: Which antidepressants are ok to take with Vyvanse? Are Celexa & Pristiq among them?
    Thanks so much,
    Chanel

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      ChanelB,
      Celexa, Zoloft, Pristiq, Effexor, and Lexapro are the cleanest on 2D6… Prozac and Paxil the predictable worst. Wellbutrin and Cymbalta must be watch at higher doses as they are moderate blockers of 2D6.
      Thanks and good reading!
      cp

  • Sarah Gogstetter

    I just finished reading your book Charles. I need to reread it before I can give it a well thought out review or opinion of your book. It is packed w/ ideas and science and it is a totally different perspective than I am used to. some of those ideas I have intuitively implemented on my own. I knew from my experience overcoming multiple birth “defects” that you need to understand the medical issues you deal w/ if you want any chance at overcoming them. I agree with you strongly on the high protein breakfast and being involved w/ one’s doctor when getting treated. I have always remained a well involved with my medical treatments. I believe these days, we can’t rely entirely on doctors, even those who do keep up with the research and breakthroughs. I believe in becoming the expert on my own medical issues, so that I can help my doctors learn the research and information that I’ve obtained. I have frequently emailed my psychiatrist, when I have come across something of interest whether it be a book, a scientific article or some program that can help. As you often put it in your book, stay tuned for more of my ideas, comments, and what not.

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      Sarah,
      Will be interested in your thots once settled on Rules.
      cp

      • Sarah Gogstetter

        The Patient’s Guide For ADHD Medication Rules: Paying Attention To The Meds For Paying Attention….Dr. Charles Parker – a quick review.

        Dr Parker’s book addresses medication issues from a very holistic point of view. He discusses how issues with metabolism, immunity, hormones and neurotransmitter deficiencies can all affect the success of treatment of ADHD with medication. His book is packed with lots of good information and concepts. And while it addresses the issues that people with ADHD that haven’t responded well to typical medication methods, I think all of us who have ADHD can benefit from reading his book. Warning: his book is a little dry, however, I still recommend this book because it is packed with high quality neuroscience and very logical guidelines of how to discuss medication issues with your doctor.

        • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

          Sarah,
          Thanks for your review, hope some find it helpful!
          cp

          • Sarah Gogstetter

            You’re Welcome, Charles :)

      • Sarah Gogstetter

        I always recommend this book to people who have issues with medications.

  • Cynthia

    Facebook Dr Parker?

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      Cynthia,
      On FB at Chuck Parker.
      cp

  • Chris

    Hi Dr. Parker,

    I’ve just finished reading your latest book, and have really enjoyed it. Thank you sincerely for making it so easily attainable. I believe that what you wrote about “Indecisive, Thinking ADD’ in Chapter 4 describes me perfectly (to a T), and I was wondering generally what types of treatment/medication individuals falling under this spectrum most readily respond to? As always, your insights are truly appreciated.

    Chris

    • http://www.CorePsychBlog.com Dr Charles Parker

      Chris,
      Treatments for the subtypes remain fairly similar, as each of these subsets, assuming no other comorbidity, is a reflection of PFC cooling and need for increased excitatory neurotransmission – from DA to NE to PEA, even in some cases Glutamate as described in my Intuniv posts.

      Thanks so much for your kind remarks, I do think that chapter will hit many folks when they see it – that particular chapter is the main diagnostic game-changer for the coming years.
      cp

  • Denise B

    Hi Tracey,

    I could have written your post. Same meds, same troubles with emotional outbursts and arguing. I have my test kit and am getting my sample tomorrow morning and will send it off! Would love to hear your progress. Dr. Parker, I have an E-mail coming to you, thanks for all your help! And can’t wait to download your new book!

    Denise

  • Pingback: Mental Disorders 101

  • Pingback: ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science? | Navaneeth.in

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention ADHD Medication Rules: Why not use the science? -- Topsy.com

Previous post:

Next post: